Thursday, December 29, 2011

Meryl Dorey @ Woodford Folk - Vaccination Saves Lives

It might seem odd to have Meryl Dorey and Vaccination Saves Lives in the same heading but there is good reason for it.

To cut a long story short, just go to Meryl Dorey visits Woodford Folk Festival and follow the collection of links there.

Listen to this special Token Skeptic podcast with Kylie Sturgess and get the full background to the Vaccination Saves Lives, "Operation Nutcracker" campaign.



Vaccination Saves Lives: Stop The 
Australian Vaccination Network
 

Saturday, December 24, 2011

Breaking News: Woodford/Meryl Dorey late change

I saw rumblings a while ago on Twitter and now Jason Brown reports a change in the Woodford program.

It seems that the backlash against anti-vaccine campaigner Meryl Dorey being invited to speak at Woodford Folk Festival has had some effect and she will no longer be doing a solo talk on autism. She will now be taking part in a vaccine forum, alongside an immunologist. This is still disappointing.

Debates or forums in which one participant is entirely unqualified to speak on the issue at hand tend to legitimise that person in the eyes of average audience members. A forum like this could make it look like Ms Dorey has scientific qualifications those of the immunologist, when she does not.

Professor Suhrbier will need to be on his toes and be ready to counter potentially bizarre arguments and wildly inaccurate statistics that could well come out of left field.

Regardless, there's little doubt the blogosphere and Twitter will be alive with conversation after the event takes place.

Friday, December 23, 2011

Tim Minchin scrapped

Apparently you shouldn't see this video performance. So please don't watch it. Okay?

Thursday, December 15, 2011

Holistic Medicine

If holistic medicine treats the whole person by energising the body to use its innate defences against dis-ease in order to restore balance naturally - why are there so many different holistic therapies and why do so many practitioners practise several of them?

Surely just one would be enough.

Meryl Dorey, Woodford Festival, Activism

What an absolute blast the last couple of weeks has been.

Things started heating up when it came to light that a contractor employed by the Burzynski Cancer Clinic was sending threatening emails to bloggers who'd questioned the clinic's treatment claims. The international sceptical blogosphere went nuts and within days, the story had been told on over 100 blogs and was ultimately mentioned in the mainstream press. We should remember that the saga is ongoing. On that score, 17-year-old Welsh blogger Rhys Morgan has a write-up in The Guardian, republished in Australia's Brisbane Times and Sydney Morning Herald.

But, closer to home, all eyes have turned to the Woodford Folk Festival, a week-long music event that also includes individual speakers and speakers' forums. Among this year's speakers is Meryl Dorey of the misnamed "Australian Vaccination Network".

Ms Dorey is a renowned anti-vaccinationist. She denies being anti-vaccine and prefers to describe herself as "pro-choice" but here's a sample of her writing [link via The Drum Opinion]...

There will come a time – I pray to God that it will happen in my lifetime – when those who have pushed vaccines upon innocent, helpless babies – doctors, pharmaceutical companies, government officials – will be proven to have lied and cheated these instruments of death into our children's bloodstream.

Since vaccine choice isn't really an issue in Australia (it's not compulsory) and since she has also described vaccination as rape and sells t-shirts saying "...never inject them", it's difficult to see how she can be considered anything but anti-vaccine.

The Woodford website says the following about Ms Dorey...

"Her information is sourced from medical data and is necessary for anyone who has a family or is thinking about being vaccinated."

The NSW Health Care complaints Commission, on the other hand, says the AVN website...
  • provides information that is solely anti-vaccination
  • contains information that is incorrect and misleading
  • quotes selectively from research to suggest that vaccination may be dangerous.
Spot the difference?

Meryl apparently has no qualifications in immunology or medicine or any vaguely related science. I'm unaware that she has any formal qualifications in any sort of science at all. Indeed, I've spent quite a bit of time blogging about her failure to get even the simple things right - things that most people would expect to learn in high school - and her apparent support for conspiracy theories, including the idea that vaccination is a tool used by lizard people to commit genocide.

So, Ms Dorey's inclusion on the Woodford Folk Festival speakers' list, and more-importantly, her being described as some sort of expert in vaccination, has resulted in a social-media campaign against the Woodford organisers. There have been calls for Woodford to retract her invite, for sponsors to pull out, for a right-of-reply from someone who actually knows some real things about vaccination or for sceptical activists to attend and counter her misinformation.

The backlash began on Twitter and Facebook but mushroomed after online magazine Mamamia published an article by Peter Bowditch. This story has now had a hearing in the mainstream and popular media, including

The Drum on ABC
2UE's Tracey Spicer
The Conversation
The Drum Opinion

Jason Brown has a much longer and growing list on his wiki.

What's truly surprising about this saga is the volume of commentary it has generated. As I write this, the two-days old Mamamia article has over 1500 comments from people supporting and opposing vaccination. Dr Rachael Dunlop's article on The Drum was published just this morning and already has over 320 post-moderation comments published.

So, while some people appear to think it was a bad idea to mount this campaign against Ms Dorey's appearance at Woodford, there can be no doubt that it has generated a lot of interest with some of the most-open public debate I think I've ever witnessed on an issue like this.

Mamamia, in particular, are to be congratulated for allowing anti-vax comments to stay and be eviscerated by a whole range of people who know what they're talking about. That thread, along with similar commentary on Dr Rachael Dunlop's October Mamamia article, will serve as a useful database for collecting anti-vax canards in the future.

UPDATE:

I think this VAIS article sums the situation up rather nicely.

Monday, December 12, 2011

Meryl Dorey - slowly roasted at Mamamia

It is no secret that outspoken anti-vaccinationist Meryl Dorey of the misnamed Australian Vaccination Network is billed to appear at this year's Woodford Folk Festival. This has, obviously, ruffled the feathers of those people who support vaccination - and rational discourse - and blogs are starting to pop up about it.

Online parenting magazine Mamamia has published an article about the event and opened it up for comments. I recommend you take a look and maybe even add your own thoughts. Click the Woodford link above to get there. Meryl isn't really being slowly roasted though. She's been thoroughly toasted.

Read more about Meryl at Woodford here, where you'll also find links to other blogs.

Sunday, December 11, 2011

Learnin proply

A follow on from my last post - this time in rhyme...

it takes a gooder education
to see the troof of vaccination
but the learnin what you get must be specific

an conspiratorial tract
is better then an actual fact
or of anyfink remotely scientific

Saturday, December 10, 2011

Education versus vaccination

Spotted on the AVN Facebook page...

The first comment reads...

yes it is true - more educated parents are less likely to vaccinate at all. My sisters friend works at the day care centre at Sydney Airport and she said 90% of pilots children are not immunised

Now, I'm no literary genius but I was always taught that sentences should start with a capital letter. Also, my gut feeling is that yes it is true should really have a comma - Yes, it is true. I'd even be comfortable with a full stop after that but I'm open to discussion on that point (pardon the pun).

Next we have "more educated parents are less likely to vaccinate at all."

Now, unless this person is implying that the majority of educated people don't vaccinate, in which case he'd be demonstrably wrong, then I think he should be using a compound modifier so as to avoid ambiguity. Therefore, I suspect, he really should have written more-educated parents...

And then we get... "My sisters friend works at the day care centre at Sydney Airport and she said 90% of pilots children are not immunised"

I'm tempted to write my sister's friend's cousin works in an immunology lab and she said that 90% of all immunologists don't let their kids go in aeroplanes but I won't because I'm not deconstructing logic here - and it's not true anyway - but it could be.

Leaving aside the rather strange implication that pilots would know more about immunology than, say, immunologists, what we have in the sentence under scrutiny are two examples of the possessive case and yet there's not an apostrophe in sight. Surely that should be either sister's, if he's referring to the friend of just one sister, or sisters', with a trailing apostrophe, if he's referring to a friend shared by more than one sister.

And what about the pilots? Shouldn't that be pilot's or pilots', again depending on whether he's referring to 90% of just one pilot's children or 90% of the children of more than one pilot?

The first respondent to the comment went on to write...

75% of doctors dont vaccinate there own children...

I think the words she was looking for were don't and their. I'm also struck by the ambiguity of the statement and find myself wanting to ask "so who do they get to vaccinate them instead?"

I have no idea why she concluded with an ellipsis.

I love irony.

Oh, and my children are vaccinated.

Woodford Folk Festival - is it for you?

Update: Mamamia have now covered the Woodford Folk Festival issue. The comment section is open - and it's busy.

Reasonable Hank warns about one of the speakers invited to this year's Woodford Folk Festival, Dec 27-Jan 1.

For some reason, unfathomable to me, the event organisers have decided to invite Meryl Dorey, of the misnamed "Australian Vaccination Network", to speak at the six-day music festival. 

The promotion piece for her talk reads...

Investigate before you vaccinate is the motto of the AVN. Having collected reports of thousands of Australian families whose children have been killed or injured by these shots, Meryl knows that the benefits of vaccines don't always outweigh the risks. Her information is sourced from medical data and is necessary for anyone who has a family or is thinking about being vaccinated.

Some of Ms Dorey's information might be "sourced" from medical data but I have serious doubts that is necessary for anyone to hear her selective re-interpretation of that data. Indeed, in my experience, she lacks the skill or qualifications required to interpret even the simplest information (she is not a doctor nor is she formally trained, to my knowledge, in any science) and would, in all likelihood, be incapable of understanding, let alone re-interpreting, complex medical research.

Despite this, the organisers of the musical event presumably think Meryl Dorey has something worthwhile to offer event-goers on the subject of vaccination. Perhaps they share her views on medical conspiracies and the evils of "toxins". I don't know. Perhaps they simply think their target audience will be sympathetic to and supportive of Dorey's often-bizarre ideas about vaccination and medicine in general, though I'd disagree that this, in itself, is reason enough to feed such delusions.

Following are just some of the bizarre thoughts, opinions and ideas that Ms Dorey has displayed publicly. If you're thinking of attending Woodford, ask yourself if this a "target audience" you want to be associated with...

Meryl Dorey has, in the past, promoted David Icke's notion that vaccination is a tool of the Illuminati who use it to control the population through the injection of microchips which can also be used to remotely perpetrate genocide with a view to mass culling the population. Mr Icke also believes the world is controlled shape-shifting reptilian aliens (lizard people).

I shouldn't really need to say any more about her but there is more. Lots more.

Ms Dorey regularly displays errors of simple logic and arithmetic. In once case concluding that if 88% of a group of infected children were vaccinated, then 88% of vaccinated children must have become infected. No one with even a basic grasp of maths or science would make this syllogistic error (if all dogs have four legs, then all things with four legs are dogs).

In another case of blatant misinterpreting of simple data sets, Ms Dorey said "There are 10,000 unvaccinated children in California – a state with a population of over 36,000,000. That means that less than .03% of California’s population is opting out of vaccination." In fact, the number of unvaccinated children in a population tells us nothing useful about the total number of unvaccinated people in a population. Indeed, as I showed at the time, the true rate of vaccine avoidance was closer to 24% - 800 times greater than Ms Dorey's figure. Sure, it's a simple mistake for the average person to make by conflating two exclusive data sets - but average people don't hold themselves up to be scientific experts or speak at folk music festivals about the serious issue of child health.

Further to this, the article Ms Dorey got the figures from stated, clearly, that "exemption" was as high as 50% in one school. Even if her "whole-of-population" exemption calculation had been even almost-close-to right, it would still have been irrelevant when the exemption rate in specified areas of concern was incredibly high. Anyone with a rudimentary understanding of statistics would surely know this.

And, if that isn't enough, Ms Dorey claimed in October this year that one childhood vaccine was contaminated at the level of 9-10 parts per million with mercury. She was quickly corrected and accepted that the correct rate, from the research, was in fact expressed in parts per BILLION. She was wrong by a factor of 1000. It's bad enough that she made this simple error when she claims to be expert enough to re-interpret "raw data" in ways different to the scientists who carry out research, but she repeated the "parts per million" claim in a more-recent Facebook comment.

In another comment, on ABC Radio, Ms Dorey claimed that "...the fact is that in the United States they are actually blaming the use of the whooping cough vaccine for this outbreak that's occurring in countries where the vaccine is being used." This is something of a serious oversimplification of the research which showed, in fact, that the vaccine works very, very well but doesn't last as long as we'd like leaving vaccinated people vulnerable to infection sooner than expected and reducing herd immunity as a result.

But there are other problems with the message Ms Dorey sells - and rest assured she does sell it, with regular suggestions to her Facebook followers to buy this or that from the AVN shop, an online store that includes a lot of things for sale that are available for free download elsewhere.

In January this year Ms Dorey, who claims not to be anti-vaccine, equated vaccination with rape "with full penetration". Is Ms Dorey not "anti-rape"?

In June last year, Ms Dorey told Perth radio host Howard Sattler that TB vaccination had never been part of the Australian vaccine schedule. She was wrong. Blatantly wrong, as millions of Australians could attest.

I could go on. There are lots more examples but I'll finish with the fact that the NSW Health Care Complaints Commission had the following to say about Ms Dorey's Australian Vaccination Network (AVN)...

The Commission’s investigation established that the AVN website:
  • provides information that is solely anti-vaccination
  • contains information that is incorrect and misleading
  • quotes selectively from research to suggest that vaccination may be dangerous.
That's really all that should need to be said.

Although I do worry about the error-riddled advice and information Ms Dorey is almost certain to offer attendees at Woodford, I'm not going to attempt to convince the organisers to rethink their decision to invite Ms Dorey. I have a feeling that would involve having them rethink their own views about vaccination first (I hope I'm wrong).

Instead, I'll ask you, if you were thinking of going along, do you feel it's okay to use folk music to help spread dangerous misinformation about children's health? Is this something you really want to support?

If you don't support her views but still choose to attend, because folk music runs through your veins or something, then maybe you can at least keep an eye out for any sort of AVN fundraising activity and, should you see it, report it to the appropriate authorities.

UPDATE:
More here and here.
And there's a growing list here.
PZ Myers has weighed in.

I am neither a doctor, nor a scientist nor even a statistician. Neither is Meryl Dorey. Do not trust either of us with the health of you or your children. See a doctor - a real doctor who doesn't think the world is run by lizard-people

Friday, December 9, 2011

Wonky layout

I've just noticed my blog layout has gone awry. If it looks odd to you too then rest assured I haven't meddled with anything so I guess something spontaneously broke under the hood. I'll leave it for a while to see if it's just another case of Google imposing dumb decisions on bloggers without notice (if so, I'm sure they'll tell me, somewhere, that the blog's never looked so good).

If it doesn't resolve itself I'll dig through the CSS and see what needs tweaking.

Thursday, December 8, 2011

Dr Ken Harvey resigns from Labor over TGA

Dr Ken Harvey is Adjunct Senior Lecturer of Public Health at La Trobe University. He is also a prolific lobbyist for better regulation of the Australian health system and has been the subject of two law suits this year as a result of those activities. While he has received awards for the promotion of reason, he is not remotely popular with promoters of quackery and snake oil.

The Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA) is a misnamed government authority that includes a lot of non-therapeutic goods on the lists it maintains (and "approves" in the minds of the average consumer) and which it doesn't seem to administer in a particularly effective way. As the federal regulator of "therapeutic" goods the TGA should, theoretically, make Dr Harvey's quack-busting efforts worthwhile. But, for the most part, it absolutely fails at this task as can be shown by a quick look at the shelves in your local pharmacy.

Homeopathy, weight-loss, detox, ear candles... the list of non-evidence-based "therapeutic products" is long. But the TGA doesn't assess efficacy for these products, it concerns itself only with an assessment of "safety". Since homeopathy (sugar pills or pure water for the most part), for example, won't directly cause you harm, the TGA happily sits by while it is sold as a form of medicine.

The TGA is a toothless tiger that takes almost forever to get around to doing anything at all and then, when it finally tells a snake oil salesman to stop telling lies about a product, the "directive" is often ignored. At this point, it seems, the TGA usually does nothing more.

It's a great system. It's like owning a car without an engine. Sure it still looks like a car and you can genuinely tell people you own a car but, as a mode of transport, it's worthless.

Today, the federal government announced its response to a review of the TGA. Here was an opportunity to put in place some decent rules and guidelines that would make it harder for people to just make up crap about a worthless product then advertise and sell it to naive or desperate consumers as if it were medicine. Here was a chance to give the TGA some well-funded teeth so it could pursue those who ignored the rules. But it seems the government has decided to do neither. Although they are making changes, it looks likely that nothing much will change as far as sellers of snake oil are concerned.

In effect, they're going to polish the car and add some pinstripes so it will look different - and they can honestly say they "made changes" - but it still won't get you anywhere when you need it.

It's a win for the heartless wankers in our communities. Regardless of "the big four's" deliberations over this week's interest rates announcement, the hucksters will continue to laugh all the way to their banks.

As a result of the announcement, Dr Harvey writes...

I’ve been a card carrying member of the Labor Party for some time. I worked hard to get rid of the Howard government and get Labor elected and I’ve sat on a number of the working parties and consultations that have made the recommendations outlined above.

But I can no longer be a member of the party when a Labor government fails to implement unanimous recommendations from its own working parties, and continues to procrastinate after a decade of calls for effective sanctions on advertising violations. I have today submitted my resignation.

The Croakey Blog tells us more about Dr Harvey's legal battle with SensaSlim - a battle that began as a result of him lodging a complain with the TGA - a body supposedly put in place for that very purpose.


The opinion expressed here is based on early reports. As always, I'm open to correction on the finer details.

Friday, December 2, 2011

Ballarat Independent - credible sources only

The Ballarat Independent is an online news outlet set up, apparently, to offer an alternative to The Courier. Not living in Ballarat, I can't say I've ever read The Courier, but if the Independent's latest piece on vaccination is an example of an alternative viewpoint, the The Courier might well be the most rational newspaper in the country.

I could sit here for half an hour or more carefully wading through and challenging the near-endless stream of anti-vaccination canards but, frankly, I should only have to point out that the lengthy opinion piece (though it is not labelled as such) is the work of a couple of itinerant food reviewers.

Yes, they travel around eating stuff and The Ballarat Independent apparently feel this qualifies them to write on complex medical issues.

I don't think anyone at The Courier will be losing much sleep anytime soon.

Kinder, gentler scepticism

As the Streisand Effect went into full swing over quasi-legal threats from the Burzynski Clinic against bloggers, Twitter was alive with commentary. Unfortunately, it seems some Tweeters decided to try and educate people who are, or want to be, Burzynski patients (I don't do Twitter so I picked this up from secondary comments).

This action [if it occurred] is despicable. The patients are not an enemy in this discussion. Few of us know how we would act if faced with serious adverse events with very few options for remedy. People who have been told that conventional medicine cannot deal with their ailment are rightly desperate and most likely vulnerable. They are not idiots - even if they do seek out "miracle cures".

As sceptics, our efforts can appear to be against the interests of desperate people looking for an answer. When we question or cast doubt on those we see as charlatans, whether they be psychic-mediums, perpetual-motion inventors, religious prophets or miracle healers, we are often seen to be also condemning those who see these same people as genuine.

This dilemma is outlined in some detail at The Twenty-First Floor.

There are some interesting yet differing views in the commentary...

This is an excellent blogpost, and brings up one of the awful sides of being a skeptic – in a situation like the one we’re in the middle of, the interested world splits into two ‘teams’ – on one side is the quack and the families he is treating, and on the other are the skeptics. The thing that we cannot give the families is the thing they get from the quacks – hope...  [David H]

I don't know what the answer to the dilemma is.